Euan Duncan
PartnerEuan has been advising on intellectual property matters and commercial contracts throughout his career.
He regularly advises on all areas of law relating to intellectual property, technology and media – digital and non-digital, contentious and non-contentious. On a daily basis, Euan is involved with drafting, negotiating and advising on commercial contracts from sale to purchase, distribution to retail and sponsorship to endorsement. In addition, he is focused on helping businesses identify, protect, commercialise and drive value from their intellectual property, including by complex licensing structures.
Euan tutors on Intellectual Property and Commercial Contracts at the University of Strathclyde Law School. He is the Chair of the Glasgow Short Film Festival. He is also a Director of ADVOC Europe and an ambassador for the Glasgow School of Art Development Trust.
Euan is ranked for Intellectual Property in the 2025 edition of Chambers UK Guide to the Legal Profession. He is also listed in the WTR (World Trademark Review) 1000 and is described by clients as "fantastic for licensing, contracts and pre-litigation negotiation" and "an extremely safe pair of hands".
Article
On the Rocks: Legal safeguards and risks in Whisky cask investment
The Whisky cask investment market is growing rapidly, attracting investors with promises of high returns in a sector known for its heritage and exclusivity. However, as demand has surged, so too has fraudulent activity. And both businesses and investors must be aware.
News
MFMac champions Scottish drinks industry through Fife Whisky Festival sponsorship
MFMac is championing Scottish Whisky as a key sponsor of the Fife Whisky Festival 2025. MFMac has sponsored the festival since its inception in 2018 and the continuation of the partnership reinforces its commitment to Scotland's world-renowned whisky industry.
The Beginning of the End for Lookalikes?
The recent Thatcher’s vs. Aldi appeal ruling is a game-changer for brand owners in the food and drink industry. The Court of Appeal’s decision sends a clear message: mimicking a brand’s appearance to exploit its reputation will no longer go unchallenged.